Sunday, November 25, 2012
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Caucasian Women Have More Incidences of Breast Cancer but Have Fewer Deaths than African-Americans
According to the organization, Susan G. Komen For the Cure,
breast cancer is the second most common cancer among women in the United
States. Breast cancer is caused by hormonal imbalances within the body.
Incidence rates are higher among Caucasian
women
The American Cancer Society states that breast cancer
incidence rates are higher among Caucasian women than African American
women. From 2005-2009, the National
Cancer Institute reported about 127,300 white women were diagnosed with breast
cancer and 121,200 black women were diagnosed.
However, African Americans tend to have a higher incidence rate before
forty years of age.
Mortality rates are higher
among African American women
Although Caucasian women reported a higher number of incidences
of breast cancer, African American women died more from breast cancer. Of the incidence rates stated previously by
the National Cancer Institute, 22,400 Caucasian women died from breast cancer
and 31,600 African Americans died.
The lack of screening and
diagnosis of breast cancer early causes more deaths.
It doesn’t seem to add up why more white women have
the disease but more black women die from it.
A lot of research has been conducted in attempts to try and understand
this phenomenon. According to Susan G.
Komen For the Cure, this may be due to
differences in specific risk factors, the biology of the breast cancer, but
most importantly the breast cancer screening rates and treatment. There are a number of variables that can lead
to African American women to not get screened as often if they do at all. One variable could be the cost of getting
screened especially if one doesn’t have health insurance. Another variable could just be simply the
lack of awareness about the disease and/or screening tests. Some women also do not have access to
screening facilities.
Sunday, November 11, 2012
According to Students, Technology Enhances Learning
Two college students at the University of Maryland were asked how they felt about technology.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The Participation Gap is Affecting How US Citizens Use Cell Phones
As technology continues to
progress, the idea of a digital divide and a participation gap have began to
develop. Kevin Guidry from Indiana
University writes an article discussing this topic. According to his article, the digital divide
is basically the gap between the number of Americans that own computers and
have Internet access in their homes and the number of Americans that do not own
computers and have Internet access in their homes. Those who tended not to have Internet in
their homes were underemployed, less educated, and Black or Hispanic. The participation
gap refers to how those two groups mentioned previously use the Internet
differently. Those who do not have
Internet access in their homes and have to use the computer in a public place
obviously have many limitations. For
example, according to the National Education Association (NEA), they have
limited times when they can use the Internet and limited websites they can
visit because public places block certain sites. Also, they do not have the ability to
download, store, and upload material.
Personally, I believe that there is
a participation gap and not a digital divide.
It is especially evident in a survey conducted by Pew Research Center
regarding how registered voters use their cell phones to keep up with the
upcoming 2012 election. In the article
“The State of the 2012 Election --- Mobile Politics”, eighty-eight percent of
registered voters own a cell phone.
Twenty-seven percent of these voters used their cellphone to keep up
with the election. Nineteen percent have
sent text messages to family and friends regarding the election and only five
percent have signed up to receive text messages directly form a candidate or
other group involved in the campaign.
Because three fourths of registered voters have the capability to send
and receive text messages, it seems as it they just do not use their cell
phones to its fullest capabilities. It
could be a result of not knowing how to work the cell phone or not wanting to. Also, a little less than half of voters own
smartphones. Most of those who own
smartphones use their smartphone to read other people’s comments on social
networking sites regarding a certain candidate or about the campaign in
general. However, only eighteen percent
of smartphone owners post their own comments on those type of websites.
The digital divide has lessened
over the years in my opinion. In three
to five years, I can see the participation gap doing the same thing. Right now, as the election is concerned,
television is a major tool for reaching audiences. The debates, commercials, and news stations
give the voters a lot of information regarding the campaigns. In turn, it causes voters not to turn their
cell phones to obtain this information. As
technology continues to grow, I believe that in future elections the use of mobile
phones will become more prevalent. Apps
and text messages will become common ways to reach voters especially the new
generation of voters. I believe this
will be possible especially with the rise of smartphones.
Friday, October 12, 2012
Australian Entertainment Industry is Similar to the United States
Although Australia is about 9760 miles from the US (about a
21 hour plane ride), their forms of entertainment are very similar to America’s
especially in television.
TV remains number one
source for entertainment in Australia
The citizens of Australia enjoy similar forms of
entertainment as citizens in other countries.
Although the Internet and music are common forms of entertainment,
television still is Australians first choice.
According to the Sydney Morning Herald, 63 percent of Australians
preferred watching TV for entertainment.
The Internet and music followed behind in that order. This same study, which was performed by
Deloitte, showed that 64 percent of citizens in Australia prefer watching
television live despite the fact new inventions such as digital video recorders
(DVRs) have come into the picture.
Although it seems that the TV industry is thriving, funding from
advertising might be in trouble.
Research has displayed that even though the citizens are watching TV,
they are doing other things at the same time.
Most of the activity that occurs while watching TV happens on electronic
mobile devices. This may cause a problem for audience-dependent television
networks. Also, advertisers may use this
information and find other ways to reach specific audiences.
Public vs. commercial
television both dominate Australian TV

American influences
visibly shown in Australian entertainment
You would be surprised by the influence the United States
has on the entertainment industry in Australia.
I was shocked to see that many television shows have been adapted in
their country. Australia’s Next Top
Model, The Biggest Loser, and Australian Idol are a few examples.
Also, American influences are shown in movies to my surprise. My assumption was that movies shown in United States movie theaters would not be shown in movie theaters around the world. Of course I was wrong. Last week, Taken 2 led the Australian box office. Not too far behind, Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted was second. Australians tend not to support movies created by their fellow citizens. According to Screen Australia, films under Australian creative control made $42.9 million in 2011, which only makes up 3.9 percent of the total Australian box office.
The Australian entertainment industry has been successful in sending its productions in English-speaking countries. The good news is if you are planning to visit Australia anytime soon you won’t feel out of place as far as entertainment is concerned.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)